(** Throughout this section, click on the upper left icon to return
to the Activities Main page **)
- Form teams of 2 students each. As a class, decide on a clear "resolution" for the debate (one
team will have to argue for this resolution, and another team will have to argue against it).
Prepare information and arguments about both the pros and cons of salmon conservation for a
debate about this issue. An example of a resolution for this debate is: "Be it resolved that more
money should be spent on salmon conservation."
- Each team must have two arguments to make per team member. You will have to find
supporting information by reading through parts of Haig-Brown's
books, other books about salmon conservation, and this web site. Consider the perspective
of the government, commercial fishermen, First Nations people, and conservationists.
||First Nations Symbol
- Five minutes before the debate is about to begin the instructor tells the teams which side they
- A "pro" team and a "con" team will assemble at the front of the class. Each student must
make their arguments for whichever team they represent plus a rebuttal (where the student makes
statements which counter information and arguments the opposing team has presented). There
must be a timer. The order of events is:
- First speaker for pro team - 2 minutes
- First speaker for con team - 3 minutes (including rebuttal)
- Second speaker for pro team - 3 minutes (including rebuttal)
- Second speaker for con team - 3 minutes (including rebuttal)
- First speaker for pro team speaks again - 1 minute rebuttal: cannot introduce new points
- The teacher and/or students may be the judges of the debates. Points shall be given for:
- logical arguments
- strength of arguments
- effective rebuttals
- clarity of voice (including, "Honourable judges, worthy opponents, ladies and gentlemen,")
Top of page.